Preventing a brave New World WK5 assignment Essay

Preventing a brave New World WK5 assignment - hear ExampleHe presss that whatever scientists call therapeutic cloning, is the use of embryos as a slip of tissues (Kass, 2001, p. 327). He also offers some reasons against cloning which covers both reproductive and therapeutic cloning. In his arguments against cloning, Kass advocates for ethical serve in biomedical projects. His views however, may face some challenges. In this essay, the discussion will cover Kass reasons for advocating for a ban on human cloning, and the strengths and weaknesses of his argument. Kass Reasons against Human Cloning Kass has four reasons against human cloning. That the put to work of cloning mankind is unethical, because the child to-be is used in an experiment that subjects him or her to risks of developmental and bodily abnormalities. That cloning threatens somebodyity and confuses identity. The clon is made from a genotype that has already lived. This denies the cloned individual his or her indi viduality. The process of cloning results in an individual that could be a twin to the person he/she should refer to as a mother or a father. It means the clones relation to the parent is confused. That cloning is a way of bout procreation into manufacture, and that it is a major form of child abuse and parental tyranny (Kass, 2001, p. 324-328). Strengths of the Argument distinguish shows that cloning is very risky and expensive. According to Sharma (2007), cloning is inefficient and 90% of attempts fail. Cloned animals move over been found to have high rate infection, carcinoma, low immunity levels and some disorders. Even Dolly sheep suffered some abnormalities when it was five years old (Gupta, 2004, p. 256). Evidence also shows that cloned animals genomes are compromised and some of them behave abnormally. They also suffer from congenital abnormalities collectible to programming errors. some(a) cloned animals die young (Sharma, 2007, p. 167). The concept of cloning supports the argument on identity and individuality. The process involves removal or deactivation of a nucleus from an unfertilized egg and introduction of a corporeal cell nucleus from a selected adult (Levine, 2009, p. 9). This means that the cloned individual will not have the graphic genetic distinctiveness and independence. Procreation has indeed been turned into a manufacturing process. Levine indicates that cloning technology already has commercial uses with many private companies and academic scientists owning different patents. These patents cover various elements of derivation of human embryonic floor cells, and nuclear transfer technique (Levine, 2009, p. 144). Weaknesses of the Argument Different people have different views on what is terms or right. Arguments against cloning, therefore, that procreation has been turned into a manufacturing process, that cloning leads to the production of abnormal babies, and that the cloned individual may overlook identity and individuali ty may all not be considered unethical by some people. Some may argue that malformed, unhealthy and abnormal children are born every year due to various factors. Some may argue that Kass arguments do not consider the goodness of well-being. Some may argue that considering the advantages of well-being over disadvantages could be more appropriate (The Presidents Council on Bioethics, 2002). Conclusion Cloning should be censor based on the reasons given by Kass. Apart from