Karl Marx's Estranged Labor vs. Adam Smith's Division of Labor Research Paper

Karl Marxs Estranged lying-in vs. Adam Smiths Division of Labor - Research Paper ExampleWhile Marx sought to minimalize the effects of capitalism, Smith sought to emphasize the luster of the free market economy. Naturally, these two individuals ideologies clash, but there is value in both perspectives, as iodin shall soon see. Karl Marxs ideas about estranged grasp, Smiths ideas about the division of labor, and a semblance of the two ideologies will be herein attempted. II. Karl Marxs Estranged Labor Karl Marx identifies estranged labor as labor alien to homosexual. Marx explains the measure up of estranged labor as the termination of man participating in an alien to his nature. It my interpretation that man is alienated from his labor because he is non the reaper of what he sows. Because he is never the recipient of his efforts, the laborer lacks identity with what he creates. For Marx then labor is alien to the actor and does not belong to his essential being. Marx identif ies two explanations of why mans lack of identity with labor leads him to be estranged from labor. The explanation that the laborer does not develop freely his carnal and mental energy, but quite mortifies his mind, may extol the virtue of communism. In other words, labor fails to nurture mans physical and mental capacities, and instead, drains them. Because the worker is denied any nurturing in his work, no intimacy between the worker and his work develops. Although, its very hard to see how working in a sweat shop in communistic China, for example, is creating intimacy with ones work to the point that one is suitable to develop ones energy freely. Thus, this quote lack of an intimate relation with what he creates, man is summarily estranged from his labor. Further more(prenominal), labor estranges man from himself. Marx argues that the labor the worker produces does not belong to him, but to psyche else. Given this condition, the laborer belongs to someone else and is theref ore enslaved. As a result of being enslaved the worker is reduced to a subsisting animal, a condition alien to him. As an end result man is estranged from himself and is, in his words, mortified. Marx points to these situations as the reason man is essentially estranged from his labor. The incongruence between the world of things the worker creates and the world the worker lives in is the estrangement. As the worker gives up his or her contribution to the work, he or she begins to lose importance to the work and the work becomes more superior to the worker. As this happens, the sustainer of the company or organization accumulates more wealth and power and is able to overcome competition and have more power over the worker. ? I find this to be truthful based on my personal experience when I worked for a logistics company as a raptus lead. The harder I worked, the more powerful the department became, hence the more powerful the company becameand the less primary(prenominal) I beca me to the company and its superiors. The department improved a lot under my leadership whereby it generated more revenue. The result was that the company became more important than the personas stated by Marx in the above paragraphs. ? The worker becomes all the poorer the more wealth he produces, the more his production increases in power and range. The worker becomes an ever-cheaper trade good the more commodities he creates. According to Marx in Calhoun and Gerteis (2007), On the basis of political economy itself, in its own words, we have shown that the worker sinks to the level of a commodity and becomes indeed the most wretched of